HomePublications

The relevance of pyrogenic carbon for carbon budgets from fires: Insights from the FIREX experiment

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Open Access permissions

Open

Documents

Links

DOI

Authors

  • Cristina Santin
  • Stefan H. Doerr
  • Matthew W. Jones
  • Agustin Merino
  • Carsten Warneke
  • James M. Roberts

Organisational units

Abstract

Vegetation fires play an important role in global and regional carbon cycles. Due to climate warming and land use shifts, fire patterns are changing and fire impacts increasing in many of the world's regions. Reducing uncertainties in carbon budgeting calculations from fires is therefore fundamental to advance our current understanding and forecasting capabilities. Here we study 20 chamber burns from the FIREX FireLab experiment, which burnt a representative set of North American wildland fuels, to assess the following: (i) differences in carbon emission estimations between the commonly used “consumed biomass” approach and the “burnt carbon” approach; (ii) pyrogenic carbon (PyC) production rates; and (iii) thermal and chemical recalcitrance of the PyC produced, as proxies of its biogeochemical stability. We find that the “consumed biomass” approach leads to overestimation of carbon emissions by 2–27% (most values between 2% and 10%). This accounting error arises largely from not considering PyC production and, even if relatively small, can therefore have important implications for medium‐ and long‐term carbon budgeting. A large fraction (34–100%) of this PyC was contained in the charred fine residue, a postfire material frequently overlooked in fire carbon research. However, the most recalcitrant PyC was in the form of woody charcoal, with estimated half‐lives for most samples exceeding 1,000 years. Combustion efficiency was relatively high in these laboratory burns compared to actual wildland fire conditions, likely leading to lower PyC production rates. We therefore argue that the PyC production values obtained here, and associated overestimation of carbon emissions, should be taken as low‐end estimates for wildland fire conditions.

Details

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere2020GB006647
JournalGlobal Biogeochemical Cycles
Volume34
Issue number9
Early online date21 Aug 2020
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2020
Peer-reviewedYes

Keywords

    Research areas

  • ash, carbon accounting, carbon emissions, charcoal, prescribed fire, wildfire

View graph of relations

ID: 185388912

Related by author
  1. Fossil CO2 emissions in the post-COVID-19 era

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  2. Global emissions are down by an unprecedented 7% — but don’t start celebrating just yet

    Research output: Contribution to specialist publicationArticle

  3. Global Carbon Budget 2020

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  4. Climate Change Increases the Risk of Wildfires: September 2020

    Research output: Contribution to specialist publicationArticle