HomePublications

Support Needs Approach for Patients (SNAP) tool: a validation study

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Standard

Support Needs Approach for Patients (SNAP) tool: a validation study. / Gardener, A. Carole; Ewing, Gail; Mendonca, Silvia; Farquhar, Morag.

In: BMJ Open, Vol. 9, e032028, 19.11.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Gardener, A. Carole ; Ewing, Gail ; Mendonca, Silvia ; Farquhar, Morag. / Support Needs Approach for Patients (SNAP) tool: a validation study. In: BMJ Open. 2019 ; Vol. 9.

Bibtex- Download

@article{0f4cb8c47c5345ccbc793a55ee99312a,
title = "Support Needs Approach for Patients (SNAP) tool: a validation study",
abstract = "ObjectivesPatient identified need is key to delivering holistic, supportive, person-centred care but we lack tools enabling patients to express what they need to manage life with a long-term condition. The Support Needs Approach for Patients (SNAP) tool was developed to enable patients with advanced Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) identify and express their unmet support needs to healthcare professionals (HCPs), but its validity is unknown. This study aimed to establish face, content and criterion validity of the SNAP tool.DesignTwo-stage mixed-method study involving patients with advanced (COPD), and their carers. Stage 1: Face and content validity assessed though focus groups involving patients and carers considering appropriateness, relevance and completeness of the SNAP tool. Data were analysed using conventional content analysis. Stage 2: Content and criterion validity assessed in a postal survey through patient self-completion of the SNAP tool and disease impact measures (Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire, COPD Assessment Test, and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale). Content validity assessed using summary statistics; criterion validity via correlations between tool items and impact measures.Settings and participantsTwo hundred and forty patients and carers participated. Stage 1 patient and carer participants were recruited from two primary care practices and Stage 2 patients from twenty-eight practices. Participating practices located in the East of England were recruited via the NIHR Clinical Research Network: Eastern.ResultsPatients and carers found the tool patient-friendly and comprehensive, with potential clinical utility. No tool items were redundant. Clear correlations were found between tool items and the majority of items in the impact measures.ConclusionsThe SNAP tool has good face, content and criterion validity. It has potential to support the delivery of holistic, supportive, person-centred care by enabling patients to identify and express their unmet support needs to HCPs. ",
author = "Gardener, {A. Carole} and Gail Ewing and Silvia Mendonca and Morag Farquhar",
note = "Early Title: The Support Needs Approach for Patients (SNAP) tool: a validation study",
year = "2019",
month = nov,
day = "19",
doi = "10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032028",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
journal = "BMJ Open",
issn = "2044-6055",
publisher = "British Medical Journal Publishing Group",

}

RIS (suitable for import to EndNote) - Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Support Needs Approach for Patients (SNAP) tool: a validation study

AU - Gardener, A. Carole

AU - Ewing, Gail

AU - Mendonca, Silvia

AU - Farquhar, Morag

N1 - Early Title: The Support Needs Approach for Patients (SNAP) tool: a validation study

PY - 2019/11/19

Y1 - 2019/11/19

N2 - ObjectivesPatient identified need is key to delivering holistic, supportive, person-centred care but we lack tools enabling patients to express what they need to manage life with a long-term condition. The Support Needs Approach for Patients (SNAP) tool was developed to enable patients with advanced Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) identify and express their unmet support needs to healthcare professionals (HCPs), but its validity is unknown. This study aimed to establish face, content and criterion validity of the SNAP tool.DesignTwo-stage mixed-method study involving patients with advanced (COPD), and their carers. Stage 1: Face and content validity assessed though focus groups involving patients and carers considering appropriateness, relevance and completeness of the SNAP tool. Data were analysed using conventional content analysis. Stage 2: Content and criterion validity assessed in a postal survey through patient self-completion of the SNAP tool and disease impact measures (Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire, COPD Assessment Test, and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale). Content validity assessed using summary statistics; criterion validity via correlations between tool items and impact measures.Settings and participantsTwo hundred and forty patients and carers participated. Stage 1 patient and carer participants were recruited from two primary care practices and Stage 2 patients from twenty-eight practices. Participating practices located in the East of England were recruited via the NIHR Clinical Research Network: Eastern.ResultsPatients and carers found the tool patient-friendly and comprehensive, with potential clinical utility. No tool items were redundant. Clear correlations were found between tool items and the majority of items in the impact measures.ConclusionsThe SNAP tool has good face, content and criterion validity. It has potential to support the delivery of holistic, supportive, person-centred care by enabling patients to identify and express their unmet support needs to HCPs.

AB - ObjectivesPatient identified need is key to delivering holistic, supportive, person-centred care but we lack tools enabling patients to express what they need to manage life with a long-term condition. The Support Needs Approach for Patients (SNAP) tool was developed to enable patients with advanced Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) identify and express their unmet support needs to healthcare professionals (HCPs), but its validity is unknown. This study aimed to establish face, content and criterion validity of the SNAP tool.DesignTwo-stage mixed-method study involving patients with advanced (COPD), and their carers. Stage 1: Face and content validity assessed though focus groups involving patients and carers considering appropriateness, relevance and completeness of the SNAP tool. Data were analysed using conventional content analysis. Stage 2: Content and criterion validity assessed in a postal survey through patient self-completion of the SNAP tool and disease impact measures (Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire, COPD Assessment Test, and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale). Content validity assessed using summary statistics; criterion validity via correlations between tool items and impact measures.Settings and participantsTwo hundred and forty patients and carers participated. Stage 1 patient and carer participants were recruited from two primary care practices and Stage 2 patients from twenty-eight practices. Participating practices located in the East of England were recruited via the NIHR Clinical Research Network: Eastern.ResultsPatients and carers found the tool patient-friendly and comprehensive, with potential clinical utility. No tool items were redundant. Clear correlations were found between tool items and the majority of items in the impact measures.ConclusionsThe SNAP tool has good face, content and criterion validity. It has potential to support the delivery of holistic, supportive, person-centred care by enabling patients to identify and express their unmet support needs to HCPs.

U2 - 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032028

DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032028

M3 - Article

VL - 9

JO - BMJ Open

JF - BMJ Open

SN - 2044-6055

M1 - e032028

ER -

ID: 169018286