Resale Price Maintenance: Explaining the Controversy, and Small Steps Towards a More Nuanced Policy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle


Organisational units


The paper sets out why we consider that the legal framework in the EU amplifies what are in reality relatively small differences in thinking around RPM. Primarily, this is because it asks economists, in the name of legal certainty, to draw a false dichotomy between agreements and practices which are harmful and those which are beneficial. We then provide a summary of the literature on RPM and, based on this thinking, set out a few small steps that might be taken towards a more nuanced approach to assessing RPM, within a 'presumed illegality' framework without sacrificing the beneficial legal certainty that the current approach brings.


Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1278
JournalFordham International Law Journal
Publication statusPublished - 2011

View graph of relations

ID: 15523525

Related by author
  1. Disclosure as a tool for enhancing consumer engagement and competition

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  2. Music streaming: Is it a level playing field?

    Research output: Contribution to specialist publicationArticle

  3. Market Investigations for Digital Platforms: Panacea or Complement?

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  4. The Goldilocks Dilemma: When is Digital Regulation “Just Right”?

    Research output: Contribution to journalEditorial