HomePublications

Recreational use of the countryside: No evidence that high nature value enhances a key ecosystem service

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Open Access permissions

Open

Documents

Links

DOI

Authors

Organisational units

Abstract

In Western Europe, recreational amenity is presented as an important cultural ecosystem service that, along with other values, helps justify policies to conserve biodiversity. However, whether recreational use by the public is enhanced at protected areas designated for nature conservation is unknown. This is the first study to model outdoor recreation at a national scale, examining habitat preferences with statutory designation (Site of Special Scientific Interest) as an indicator of nature conservation importance. Models were based on a massive, three year national household survey providing spatially-referenced recreational visits to the natural environment. Site characteristics including land cover were compared between these observed visit sites (n = 31,502) and randomly chosen control sites (n = 63,000). Recreationists preferred areas of coast, freshwater, broadleaved woodland and higher densities of footpaths and avoided arable, coniferous woodland and lowland heath. Although conservation designation offers similar or greater public access than undesignated areas of the same habitat, statutory designation decreased the probability of visitation to coastal and freshwater sites and gave no effect for broadleaved woodland. Thus general recreational use by the public did not represent an important ecosystem service of protected high-nature-value areas, so that intrinsic and existence values remain as the primary justifications for conservation of high nature value areas. Management of ‘green infrastructure’ sites of lower conservation value that offer desirable habitats and enhanced provision of footpaths, could mitigate recreational impacts on nearby valuable conservation areas.

Details

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere0165043
JournalPLoS One
Volume11
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 9 Nov 2016
Peer-reviewedYes

Keywords

    Research areas

  • conservation habitats, ecosystem services, green infrastructure, outdoor recreation, protected areas, nature conservation, existence value, Biodiversity conservation

Bibliographic note

© 2016 Hornigold et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

View graph of relations

ID: 93487071