Post-merger Price Dynamics Matters, So Why Do Merger Retrospectives Ignore It?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Open Access permissions





Organisational units


The overwhelming majority of retrospective merger studies pool the post-merger data to estimate the average price effect of the merger. Pooled post-merger estimates ignore key information about price dynamics and are unable to identify if post-merger prices revert to pre-merger levels within the same time period. We provide evidence—from a meta-analysis of over 600 previous market-level price effect estimates, and a set of Monte Carlo experiments—that using pooled models often leads to erroneous conclusions: for example by wrongly concluding that the merger increased prices, even when this price increase was only temporary.


Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)403-429
JournalReview of Industrial Organization
Issue number3
Early online date29 Jul 2019
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2019

Downloads statistics

No data available

View graph of relations

ID: 163225921

Related by author
  1. A Review of Merger Decisions in the EU

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

  2. Fines and reputational sanctions: The case of cartels

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  3. Quantifying the deterrent effect of anticartel enforcement

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Related by journal
  1. Pro-competitive price beating guarantees

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  2. Firm size and market power in carbonated soft drinks

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle