HomePublications

Mobility endowment and entitlements mediate resilience in rural livelihood systems

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Documents

  • Accepted_Manuscript

    Accepted author manuscript, 1 MB, PDF-document

    Embargo ends: 25/01/22

  • Supplementary Information

    Other version, 373 KB, PDF-document

    Embargo ends: 25/01/22

DOI

Authors

Organisational units

Abstract

In economically marginal rural areas, choice in livelihood strategy such as decisions to move location mediates levels of individual and household resilience under conditions of environmental change. It is widely recognised that endowments associated with mobility and the entitlement to mobility are unevenly distributed across populations. This paper integrates these insights and conceptualises location choice as a set of mobility endowments and mobility entitlements. Through focussing on endowments and entitlements, the paper explores how choice affects the ability to be mobile and its role in mediating levels of resilience to livelihood shocks associated with changing environmental conditions. The research design involves measuring the impact of different climatic perturbations in rural locations in Anhui Province, China. Mixed methods of rural appraisal, life history interviews, and a household survey generate objective and perceived elements of individual and household responses to risks. These data are augmented by biophysical observations on the nature of the climatic perturbations. The results show that mobility endowments and mobility entitlements are important in determining the impact of mobility on resilience. The life history interview data highlight significant individual agency within the structures that impact on individual choices. Further, individuals and households who possess the ability to decide and to subsequently enact decisions about mobility, are shown to be more resilient compared to other individuals and households that lack such ability. Moreover, households practicing short-term, circular mobility are more resilient than those households that practice long-term mobility. The study confirms that, in these instances, choice and the ability to enact those choices mediates resilience and highlights the implications of location decisions but also the conditions in which those decisions are made.

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)172-183
Number of pages12
JournalGlobal Environmental Change
Volume54
Early online date25 Jan 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2019
Peer-reviewedYes

Keywords

    Research areas

  • Adaptation, China, Choice, Mobility, Resilience

View graph of relations

ID: 150696984