HomePublications

Is academic writing becoming more informal?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Open Access permissions

Open

Documents

DOI

Authors

Organisational units

Abstract

Informality has become something of a contemporary mantra as, from the denim-clad offices of internet startups to the pages of business reports, we are encouraged to shed old constraints and relax conventions. This paper explores the perception that since informality has now invaded a large range of written and spoken domains of discourse, academic writing has also followed this trend. It asks the question whether academics are now freer to construct less rigidly objective texts and craft a more inclusive relationship with their readers. Taking a corpus of 2.2 million words from the same leading journals in four disciplines at three periods over the past years, we explore changes in the use of ten key features regarded by applied linguists and style guide authors as representing informality. Our results show only a small increase in the use of these features, and that this is mainly accounted for by increases in the hard sciences rather than the social sciences. It is also largely restricted to increases in first person pronouns, unattended reference and sentences beginning with conjunctions. We discuss these results and argue they represent changes in rhetorical conventions which accommodate more obvious interpersonal interactions in the sciences.

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)40-51
Number of pages12
JournalEnglish for Specific Purposes
Volume45
Early online date7 Oct 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2017
Peer-reviewedYes

Keywords

    Research areas

  • Academic writing, Diachronic change, EAP, Formality, Rhetorical practices

Downloads statistics

No data available

View graph of relations

ID: 125947318

Related by author
  1. “I believe the findings are fascinating”: stance in Three-Minute Theses

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  2. A bibliometric study of EAP research: who is doing what, where and when?

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  3. Advice-giving, power and roles in theses supervisions

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Related by journal
  1. Managing evaluation: Criticism in two academic review genres

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  2. Metadiscursive nouns: Interaction and cohesion in abstract moves

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle