HomePublications

Hume’s experimental psychology and the idea of erroneous preferences

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Documents

  • full text

    Accepted author manuscript, 387 KB, PDF document

    Embargo ends: 31/12/99

Authors

Organisational units

Abstract

Hume’s Treatise of Human Nature is not only a canonical text of philosophy, but also a pioneering work of psychology, anticipating many findings of modern behavioural economics. According to Hume’s theory of mind, the concept of rationality does not apply to choices or moral judgements. But in in his theory of justice, Hume explains preference reversals between smaller-sooner and larger-later options in terms of far-sighted ‘true’ preferences and psychologically-induced errors of short-sightedness. Anticipating a common idea in behavioural welfare economics, he proposes a role for government in helping individuals to overcome self-control problems in acting justly. I examine Hume’s position and assess its coherence. I conclude that Hume’s theory of mind is consistent and psychologically well-grounded, but does not support the concepts of true preference and error that appear in his theory of justice. However, the fundamental logic of that theory does not depend on assumptions about self-control problems.

Details

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Economic Behavior & Organization
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 15 Apr 2020
Peer-reviewedYes

Keywords

    Research areas

  • Hume, Treatise of Human Nature, experimental psychology, true preference, self-control

View graph of relations

ID: 181013227

Related by author
  1. Normative economics without preferences

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  2. Hume’s theory of justice and Vanderschraaf’s Vulnerablity Objection

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  3. Focal points in experimental bargaining games

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter (peer-reviewed)

Related by journal
  1. Communication and voting in heterogeneous committees: An experimental study

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  2. Guilt and participation

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle