Four system boundaries for carbon accounts

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle


  • Zhu Liu
  • Kuishuang Feng
  • Klaus Hubacek
  • Sai Liang
  • Laura Diaz Anadon
  • Chao Zhang
  • Dabo Guan

Organisational units


Knowing the carbon emission baseline of a region is a precondition for any mitigation effort, but the baselines are highly dependent on the system boundaries for which they are calculated. On the basis of sectoral energy statistics and a nested provincial and global multi-regional input-output model, we calculate and compare four different system boundaries for China's 30 provinces and major cities. The results demonstrate significant differences in the level of emissions for the different system boundaries. Moreover, the associated emissions with each system boundary varies with the regional development level, i.e. richer areas outsource more emissions to other areas, or in other words boundary 4 emissions are higher than boundary 1 emissions for rich areas and vice versa for poor areas. Given these significant differences it is important to be aware of the implications the choice of an accounting system might have on outcomes.


Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)118-125
JournalEcological Modelling
Early online date27 Feb 2015
StatePublished - 24 Dec 2015


    Research areas

  • carbon emissions, Carbon footprint, Consumption-based emission, Multi-regional input-output analysis, Embodied emissions, China

View graph of relations

ID: 56565731

Related by author
  1. City-level water-energy nexus in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  2. Carbon emissions of cities from a consumption-based perspective

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  3. Cities: the core of climate change mitigation

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Related by journal