Compensating Competitors or Restoring Competition? EC Regulation of State Aid for Banks during the Crisis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle


Organisational units


We contrast the theory underpinning state aid for failing banks with that for failing firms in the real sector, and find that this should justify a different treatment for banks under Article 107. For example, there is little justification for measures to compensate rivals when the bank has been saved for reasons of systemic stability. We find that the formal guidance on bank restructuring aid takes insufficient notice of this. In four detailed case studies, we also find a number of inconsistencies with respect to size of subsidy, sustainability of divestitures or treatment of mergers. We conclude that while the Commission provided a useful constraint in the midst of a crisis of unprecedented scale and complexity, its approach could have been improved by focusing more closely on the fundamental justification of state aid in each case (i.e. the counterfactual).


Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)39-66
JournalJournal of Industry, Competition and Trade
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2013

View graph of relations

ID: 592752

Related by journal
  1. The New Political Economy of EU State Aid Policy

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  2. What do we conclude from the success and failure of mergers?

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle