HomePublications

Building a tool to overcome barriers in research-implementation spaces: the Conservation Evidence database

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Documents

  • Accepted_Manuscript

    Accepted author manuscript, 713 KB, PDF-document

    Embargo ends: 10/08/20

DOI

Authors

  • William J. Sutherland
  • Nigel G. Taylor
  • Douglas Macfarlane
  • Tatsuya Amano
  • Alec P. Christie
  • Lynn Dicks
  • Anaëlle J. Lemasson
  • Nick A. Littlewood
  • Philip A. Martin
  • Nancy Ockendon
  • Silviu O. Petrovan
  • Rebecca J. Robertson
  • Ricardo Rocha
  • Gorm E. Shackelford
  • Rebecca K. Smith
  • Elizabeth H.M. Tyler
  • Claire F.R. Wordley

Organisational units

Abstract

Conservation practitioners, policy-makers and researchers work within shared spaces with many shared goals. Improving the flow of information between conservation researchers, practitioners and policy-makers could lead to dramatic gains in the effectiveness of conservation practice. However, several barriers can hinder this transfer including lack of time, inaccessibility of evidence, the real or perceived irrelevance of scientific research to practical questions, and the politically motivated spread of disinformation. Conservation Evidence works to overcome these barriers by providing a freely-available database of summarized scientific evidence for the effects of conservation interventions on biodiversity. The methods used to build this database – a combination of discipline-wide literature searching and subject-wide evidence synthesis – have been developed over the last 15 years to address the challenges of synthesizing large volumes of evidence of varying quality and measured outcomes. Here, we describe the methods to enhance understanding of the database and how it should be used. We discuss how the database can help to expand multi-directional information transfers between research, practice and policy, which should improve the implementation of evidence-based conservation and, ultimately, achieve better outcomes for biodiversity.

Details

Original languageEnglish
Article number108199
JournalBiological Conservation
Volume238
Early online date10 Aug 2019
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 10 Aug 2019
Peer-reviewedYes

View graph of relations

ID: 161952624