HomePublications

Bone metabolic responses to low energy availability achieved by diet or exercise in active eumenorrheic women

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Documents

  • Accepted manuscript

    Accepted author manuscript, 759 KB, PDF-document

    Embargo ends: 19/06/19

  • Accepted manuscript

    Accepted author manuscript, 440 KB, PDF-document

    Embargo ends: 31/12/99

DOI

Authors

Organisational units

Abstract

Purpose: We aimed to explore the effects of low energy availability (EA)[15 kcal·kg lean body mass (LBM)−1·d−1] achieved by diet or exercise on bone turnover markers in active, eumenorrheic women. Methods: By using a crossover design, ten eumenorrheic women (VO2 peak: 48.1 ± 3.3 ml·kg−1·min−1) completed all three, 3-day conditions in a randomised order: controlled EA (CON; 45 kcal·kgLBM−1·d−1), low EA through dietary energy restriction (D-RES; 15 kcal·kgLBM−1·d−1) and low EA through increasing exercise energy expenditure (E-RES; 15 kcal·kgLBM−1·d−1), during the follicular phase of three menstrual cycles. In CON, D-RES and E-RES, participants consumed diets providing 45, 15 and 45 kcal·kgLBM−1·d−1. In E-RES only, participants completed supervised running sessions (129 ± 10 min·d−1) at 70% of their VO2 peak that resulted in an exercise energy expenditure of 30 kcal·kg LBM−1·d−1. Blood samples were collected at baseline (BASE) and at the end of the 3-day period (D6) and analysed for bone turnover markers (β-CTX and P1NP), markers of calcium metabolism (PTH, albumin-adjusted Ca, Mg and PO4) and hormones (IGF-1, T3, insulin, leptin and 17β-oestradiol). Results: In D-RES, P1NP concentrations at D6 decreased by 17% (BASE: 54.8 ± 12.7 μg·L−1, D6: 45.2 ± 9.3 μg·L−1, P < 0.001, d = 0.91) and were lower than D6 concentrations in CON (D6: 52.5 ± 11.9 μg·L−1, P = 0.001). P1NP did not change significantly in E-RES (BASE: 55.3 ± 14.4 μg·L−1, D6: 50.9 ± 15.8 μg·L−1, P = 0.14). β-CTX concentrations did not change following D-RES (BASE: 0.48 ± 0.18 μg·L−1, D6: 0.55 ± 0.17 μg·L−1) or E-RES (BASE: 0.47 ± 0.24 μg·L−1, D6: 0.49 ± 0.18 μg·L−1) (condition × time interaction effect, P = 0.17). There were no significant differences in P1NP (P = 0.25) or β-CTX (P = 0.13) responses between D-RES and E-RES. Both conditions resulted in reductions in IGF-1 (−13% and − 23% from BASE in D-RES and E-RES, both P < 0.01) and leptin (−59% and − 61% from BASE in D-RES and E-RES, both P < 0.001); T3 decreased in D-RES only (−15% from BASE, P = 0.002) and PO4 concentrations decreased in E-RES only (−9%, P = 0.03). Conclusions: Low EA achieved through dietary energy restriction resulted in a significant decrease in bone formation but no change in bone resorption, whereas low EA achieved through exercise did not significantly influence bone metabolism. Both low EA conditions elicited significant and similar changes in hormone concentrations.

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)181-188
JournalBone
Volume114
Early online date19 Jun 2018
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2018
Peer-reviewedYes

Keywords

    Research areas

  • energy availability, dietary energy restriction, exercise energy expenditure, bone metabolism, active eumenorrheic women

View graph of relations

ID: 136904939