Assortative mating on educational attainment leads to genetic spousal resemblance for polygenic scores

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Open Access permissions






Organisational units


We examined whether assortative mating for educational attainment (“like marries like”) can be detected in the genomes of ~ 1600 UK spouse pairs of European descent. Assortative mating on heritable traits like educational attainment increases the genetic variance and heritability of the trait in the population, which may increase social inequalities. We test for genetic assortative mating in the UK on educational attainment, a phenotype that is indicative of socio-economic status and has shown substantial levels of assortative mating. We use genome-wide allelic effect sizes from a large genome-wide association study on educational attainment (N ~ 300 k) to create polygenic scores that are predictive of educational attainment in our independent sample (r = 0.23, p < 2 × 10− 16). The polygenic scores significantly predict partners' educational outcome (r = 0.14, p = 4 × 10− 8 and r = 0.19, p = 2 × 10− 14, for prediction from males to females and vice versa, respectively), and are themselves significantly correlated between spouses (r = 0.11, p = 7 × 10− 6). Our findings provide molecular genetic evidence for genetic assortative mating on education in the UK.


Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)103–108
Number of pages6
Early online date29 Aug 2016
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2016


    Research areas

  • Assortative mating, Educational attainment, Polygenic scores

View graph of relations

ID: 89403710

Related by author
  1. The Impact of Group Identity on Coalition Formation

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  2. True Lies: Comment on Garbarino, Slonim and Villeval (2018)

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  3. Genetic Correlates of Social Stratification in Great Britain

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  4. Humans reciprocate by discriminating against group peers

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle