HomePublications

A socio-ecological landscape analysis of human-wildlife conflict in northern Botswana

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Standard

A socio-ecological landscape analysis of human-wildlife conflict in northern Botswana. / Dunnick, Jeffrey; Hartley, Robyn; Rutina, Lucas; Alves, Joana ; Franco, Aldina.

In: Oryx, Vol. 54, No. 5, 09.2020, p. 661-669.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Dunnick, Jeffrey ; Hartley, Robyn ; Rutina, Lucas ; Alves, Joana ; Franco, Aldina. / A socio-ecological landscape analysis of human-wildlife conflict in northern Botswana. In: Oryx. 2020 ; Vol. 54, No. 5. pp. 661-669.

Bibtex- Download

@article{9b7158807bb748ceaa875bcf6551fa7b,
title = "A socio-ecological landscape analysis of human-wildlife conflict in northern Botswana",
abstract = "Human-wildlife conflict is one of the most pressing issues in conservation. Low-income rural communities are disproportionately affected by negative interactions with large predators, which often leads to retaliatory killings and persecution of the animals. To overcome this, socio-ecological studies that merge existing knowledge of large predator ecology with long-term livestock depredation monitoring are required. We examined patterns and drivers of livestock depredation in northern Botswana, using a mixed effects model of the government's long-term monitoring data on human-wildlife conflict, to identify ways to reduce depredation at key spatial and temporal scales. We compared the results to farmers' understanding of their personal risk within the landscape. We analysed 342 depredation events that occurred during 2008-2016, using variables measured at different scales. The variables affecting the locations of depredation events at the 2-km scale were distance to protected areas and predator and herbivore density, with increased depredation in the wet season. At a 1-km scale, herbivore density did not have a significant effect, but the effect of other variables was unchanged. The 4-km scale model was influenced by livestock and herbivore density, with increased depredation in the wet season. Livestock depredation could be reduced by establishing an 8-km livestock-free buffer along the protected area boundary. There was disparity between government data on human-wildlife conflict, depredation reported by farmers in interviews and farmers' risk awareness. Farmers would benefit from workshops providing tools to make evidence-based decisions and minimize their risk of negative interactions with wildlife. This would ultimately contribute to wildlife conservation in the Kavango-Zambezi Transfrontier Conservation Area.",
keywords = "Botswana, human-wildlife conflict, landscape ecology, large African predators, livestock depredation, risk awareness, socio-ecology",
author = "Jeffrey Dunnick and Robyn Hartley and Lucas Rutina and Joana Alves and Aldina Franco",
year = "2020",
month = sep,
doi = "10.1017/S0030605318001394",
language = "English",
volume = "54",
pages = "661--669",
journal = "Oryx",
issn = "0030-6053",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "5",

}

RIS (suitable for import to EndNote) - Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - A socio-ecological landscape analysis of human-wildlife conflict in northern Botswana

AU - Dunnick, Jeffrey

AU - Hartley, Robyn

AU - Rutina, Lucas

AU - Alves, Joana

AU - Franco, Aldina

PY - 2020/9

Y1 - 2020/9

N2 - Human-wildlife conflict is one of the most pressing issues in conservation. Low-income rural communities are disproportionately affected by negative interactions with large predators, which often leads to retaliatory killings and persecution of the animals. To overcome this, socio-ecological studies that merge existing knowledge of large predator ecology with long-term livestock depredation monitoring are required. We examined patterns and drivers of livestock depredation in northern Botswana, using a mixed effects model of the government's long-term monitoring data on human-wildlife conflict, to identify ways to reduce depredation at key spatial and temporal scales. We compared the results to farmers' understanding of their personal risk within the landscape. We analysed 342 depredation events that occurred during 2008-2016, using variables measured at different scales. The variables affecting the locations of depredation events at the 2-km scale were distance to protected areas and predator and herbivore density, with increased depredation in the wet season. At a 1-km scale, herbivore density did not have a significant effect, but the effect of other variables was unchanged. The 4-km scale model was influenced by livestock and herbivore density, with increased depredation in the wet season. Livestock depredation could be reduced by establishing an 8-km livestock-free buffer along the protected area boundary. There was disparity between government data on human-wildlife conflict, depredation reported by farmers in interviews and farmers' risk awareness. Farmers would benefit from workshops providing tools to make evidence-based decisions and minimize their risk of negative interactions with wildlife. This would ultimately contribute to wildlife conservation in the Kavango-Zambezi Transfrontier Conservation Area.

AB - Human-wildlife conflict is one of the most pressing issues in conservation. Low-income rural communities are disproportionately affected by negative interactions with large predators, which often leads to retaliatory killings and persecution of the animals. To overcome this, socio-ecological studies that merge existing knowledge of large predator ecology with long-term livestock depredation monitoring are required. We examined patterns and drivers of livestock depredation in northern Botswana, using a mixed effects model of the government's long-term monitoring data on human-wildlife conflict, to identify ways to reduce depredation at key spatial and temporal scales. We compared the results to farmers' understanding of their personal risk within the landscape. We analysed 342 depredation events that occurred during 2008-2016, using variables measured at different scales. The variables affecting the locations of depredation events at the 2-km scale were distance to protected areas and predator and herbivore density, with increased depredation in the wet season. At a 1-km scale, herbivore density did not have a significant effect, but the effect of other variables was unchanged. The 4-km scale model was influenced by livestock and herbivore density, with increased depredation in the wet season. Livestock depredation could be reduced by establishing an 8-km livestock-free buffer along the protected area boundary. There was disparity between government data on human-wildlife conflict, depredation reported by farmers in interviews and farmers' risk awareness. Farmers would benefit from workshops providing tools to make evidence-based decisions and minimize their risk of negative interactions with wildlife. This would ultimately contribute to wildlife conservation in the Kavango-Zambezi Transfrontier Conservation Area.

KW - Botswana

KW - human-wildlife conflict

KW - landscape ecology

KW - large African predators

KW - livestock depredation

KW - risk awareness

KW - socio-ecology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85072601866&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S0030605318001394

DO - 10.1017/S0030605318001394

M3 - Article

VL - 54

SP - 661

EP - 669

JO - Oryx

JF - Oryx

SN - 0030-6053

IS - 5

ER -

ID: 141681535