HomePublications

A bibliometric study of EAP research: who is doing what, where and when?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Documents

  • Accepted_Manuscript

    Accepted author manuscript, 1.01 MB, PDF document

    Embargo ends: 22/04/22

Links

DOI

Authors

Organisational units

Abstract

This paper uses a bibliometric analysis to track changes in EAP research over the last 40 years. Based on a corpus of 12,600 EAP-related articles from 40 Social Science Citation Index (SSCI) journals, we reveal what research topics have been most popular over time and which authors, publications and source countries have been most influential. The results show that while topics concerning teaching, learning and classroom practices, have remained popular, those with a focus on contexts and discourses have grown since 2001, with substantial attention devoted to identity, interaction and genre. The most cited authors and publications also show a marked shift towards an interest in academic writing, language description and perspectives underpinning social relationships in learning and communication. Finally, our study shows that EAP is achieving a global reach as authors affiliated with emerging centres of research, particularly China, begin to make a mark on the field. We believe these findings may be of interest to EAP professionals seeking to become more familiar with the field and as a way of mapping the emergence of EAP as a maturing discipline.

Details

Original languageEnglish
Article number100929
JournalJournal of English for Academic Purposes
Volume49
Early online date22 Oct 2020
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2021
Peer-reviewedYes

Keywords

    Research areas

  • Bibliometrics, Citations, EAP authors, EAP publications, EAP research, EAP topics

View graph of relations

ID: 184899969

Related by author
  1. Pithy persuasion”: engagement in 3-minute theses

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  2. “I believe the findings are fascinating”: stance in Three-Minute Theses

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  3. The Covid infodemic: Competition and the hyping of virus research

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle